Power orientation refers to the beliefs that people in a culture hold about the
appropriateness of power and authority differences in hierarchies such as
business organizations.
Some cultures are characterized by power
respect. This means that people in a culture tend to accept the power and
authority of their superiors simply on the basis of the superiors’ positions in
the hierarchy. These same people also tend to respect the superiors’ right to
that power. People at all levels in a firm accept the decisions and mandates of
those above them because of the implicit belief that higher-level positions
carry the right to make decisions and issue mandates. Hofstede found people in
France, Spain, Mexico, Japan, Brazil, Indonesia, and Singapore to be relatively
power respecting.
Power Distance has been defined
as the extent to which the less powerful members of organizations and
institutions (like the family) accept and expect that power is distributed
unequally. This represents inequality (more versus less), but defined from
below, not from above. It suggests that a society's level of inequality is
endorsed by the followers as much as by the leaders. Power and inequality, of
course, are extremely fundamental facts of any society. All societies are
unequal, but some are more unequal than others.
Table 1 Ten Differences between
Small- and Large- Power Distance Societies
|
Small Power Distance
|
Large Power Distance
|
|
Use of power should be
legitimate and is subject to criteria of good and evil
|
Power is a basic fact of
society antedating good or evil: its legitimacy is irrelevant
|
|
Parents treat children as
equals
|
Parents teach children
obedience
|
|
Older people are neither
respected nor feared
|
Older people are both respected
and feared
|
|
Student-centered education
|
Teacher-centered education
|
|
Hierarchy means inequality of
roles, established for convenience
|
Hierarchy means existential
inequality
|
|
Subordinates expect to be
consulted
|
Subordinates expect to be told
what to do
|
|
Pluralist governments based on
majority vote and changed peacefully
|
Autocratic governments based on
co-optation and changed by revolution
|
|
Corruption rare; scandals end
political careers
|
Corruption frequent; scandals
are covered up
|
|
Income distribution in society
very uneven
|
Income distribution in society
rather even
|
|
Religions stressing equality of
believers
|
Religions
with a hierarchy of priests
|
The above table lists a selection
of differences between national societies that validation research showed to be
associated with the Power Distance dimension. For a more complete review the
reader is referred to Hofstede (2001) and Hofstede et al. (2010). The statements
refer to extremes; actual situations may be found anywhere in between the
extremes, and the association of a statement with a dimension is always
statistical, never absolute. In Hofstede et al. (2010) Power Distance Index
scores are listed for 76 countries; they tend to be higher for East European,
Latin, Asian and African countries and lower for Germanic and English-speaking
Western countries.
References
Hofstede,
G. (2001). Culture's Consequences: Comparing Values, Behaviors, Institutions
and Organizations across Nations. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage (co-published in
the PRC as Vol. 10 in the Shanghai Foreign Language Education Press SFLEP Intercultural
Communication Reference Series, 2008)
Hofstede,
G. (2006). What did GLOBE really measure? Researchers’ minds versus respondents’
minds. Journal of International Business Studies, 37, 882-96.
Hofstede,
G. (2010). The GLOBE debate: Back to relevance. Journal of International Business
Studies, 41, 1339-46.
Hofstede,
G. & Bond, M. H. (1988). The Confucius connection: from cultural roots to economic
growth. Organizational Dynamics, 16, 4-21.
Hofstede,
G. & Hofstede, G. J. (2005). Cultures and Organizations: Software of the
Mind
Hofstede,
G., Hofstede, G. J. & Minkov, M. (2010). Cultures and Organizations:
Software of the Mind (Rev. 3rd ed.). New York:
McGraw-Hill. For translations see www.geerthofstede.nl and “our
books”.
No comments:
Post a Comment